Francis 4 Principles: TIME CONQUERS SPACE
Time is greater than space
222. A constant tension exists between fullness and limitation. Fullness evokes the desire for complete possession, while limitation is a wall set before us. Broadly speaking, “time” has to do with fullness as an expression of the horizon which constantly opens before us, while each individual moment has to do with limitation as an expression of enclosure.
People live poised between each individual moment and the
greater, brighter horizon of the utopian future as the final cause which draws
us to itself. Here we see a first principle for progress in building a people:
time is greater than space.
223. This principle enables us to work slowly but surely,
without being obsessed with immediate results. It helps us patiently to endure
difficult and adverse situations, or inevitable changes in our plans. It
invites us to accept the tension between fullness and limitation, and to give a
priority to time.
One of the faults which we occasionally observe in
sociopolitical activity is that spaces and power are preferred to time and
processes. Giving priority to space means madly attempting to keep everything
together in the present, trying to possess all the spaces of power and of
self-assertion; it is to crystallize processes and presume to hold them back.
Giving priority to time means being concerned about
initiating processes rather than possessing spaces. Time governs spaces,
illumines them and makes them links in a constantly expanding chain, with no
possibility of return.
What we need, then, is to give priority to actions which
generate new processes in society and engage other persons and groups who can
develop them to the point where they bear fruit in significant historical
events. Without anxiety, but with clear
convictions and tenacity.
224. Sometimes I wonder if there are people in today’s world
who are really concerned about generating processes of people-building, as
opposed to obtaining immediate results which yield easy, quick short-term
political gains, but do not enhance human fullness.
History will perhaps judge the latter with the criterion set
forth by Romano Guardini: “The only measure for properly evaluating an age is
to ask to what extent it fosters the development and attainment of a full and
authentically meaningful human existence, in accordance with the peculiar
character and the capacities of that age”.[182]
225. This criterion also applies to evangelization, which
calls for attention to the bigger picture, openness to suitable processes and
concern for the long run.
The Lord
himself, during his earthly life, often warned his disciples that there were
things they could not yet understand and that they would have to await the Holy
Spirit (cf. Jn 16:12-13). The parable of the weeds among the wheat (cf. Mt
13:24-30) graphically illustrates an important aspect of evangelization: the
enemy can intrude upon the kingdom and sow harm, but ultimately he is defeated
by the goodness of the wheat.